PORT LIGHTS (1960)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_5939bf9a9ebb4ef88c892ef87ee35944~mv2.png
see chapter: First steps in real cinema
DIRECTION NOVEMBER (1962)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_88edf2adbe6b4de79af3dd7c38145bf7~mv2.png
see chapter: The first dodge in live action
THE FALSE NUT (1963)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_9b3c90b897f24eea85562fd9f1f2f940~mv2.png
“The False Nut” takes two years to complete. The film is entered for the Antwerp Festival and wins the First Prize. With this film, Servais takes a decisive step in professional film production: the prize he won for "Harbour Lights" enabled him to buy the Debrie and make the switch to 35 mm film. For the first time, he receives an assignment in the profession he loves: Jos Van Liempt contacts him to make the animated credits for the TV program "De drieklaphoeden" for the Belgian - Flemish-speaking - Television. At the same time, he gathers a small crew and mainly makes a really synchronized film, including sound, music and voice-off. With “De Valse Noot" he launches a series of small characters: anti-heroes, small people who are excluded from society, power, the world. This film is about a busker who operates a barrel organ. The graphics are quite conventional, compared to with the highly stylized backgrounds, which he strewn with quotes and collages. It is clear that the cell technique does not give Servais any real satisfaction. He is therefore dissatisfied and will try other things, in which again and again the convergence of the drawn image and the real world It is the beginning of an ever-increasing urge to combine realistic images with drawn animation.
The latter takes shape in a banknote, illuminated billboards, newspaper clippings, backgrounds of raw material and, for the first time, a direct borrowing from photography: a wooden horse on a merry-go-round.
The humor, which is certainly present, must convey a transparent message: by juxtaposing the little man's music box with borrowings from the real world (the jukebox, the dollar, the "atomic girl" billboard), Servais the consumer society and its exclusively material values, rather than draw a contrast between "ancient" and "modern" We are five years away from May 1968.
The film was awarded in Antwerp and praised by the critics. Maria Rosseels wrote her review in De Standaard under the title: “The Correct Valse Noot”.
CHROMOPHOBIA (1965)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_5200ea58a3b34401be48e5f07bab84cf~mv2.png
A little later, Servais receives an invitation from the Ministry of National Education to come to Brussels with his two films. After the performance, head of department Paul Louyet is so enthusiastic that he orders a short animation film from Servais on the spot. When asked what the film should be about, he promptly gets the answer: “You have carte blanche”. Servais is surprised and insists, but Louyet replies: “You do whatever you want, as long as it is a creation, not an order”. With a budget of 500,000 BF in his pocket and his head in the clouds, Servais steps out of the office…
Thus, “Chromophobia” kicks off in a kind of creative euphoria that can be felt throughout the film. The fact is simple: an army of small, identical, angular soldiers is fighting everything that has color. An attack on the world of Servais himself, an allegory of society, consisting of stylized Flemish cities, horse mills, Jan Klaassens and little girls with balloons. A small character, definitely reminiscent of Tijl Uilenspiegel, stops the horrible mechanism. Although the army of chromophobes is declared the winner, the regime that was instituted begins to waver as the color peacefully and gradually reclaims its rights in an apotheosis of flowers that herald the psychedelic years.
“Chromophobia” is the most 'readable' film in Servais' oeuvre: after this film he seems to have released himself from the burden of a constraint he had imposed on himself and he gives free rein to poetry and a much less explicit inspiration, retreating to subjects that are more personal reflections on the nature of the medium: animation, which fascinates him to the highest degree.
The film, immediately recognized for its innovative character, has won a dozen awards, including the prestigious 'Primo Premio' at the 1966 Venice International Film Festival.
Servais, who has been so intelligent and humble as to wait until he has created “Chromophobia” before submitting his films to international competitions, immediately lands at the forefront of the international animation film scene.
SIREN (1968)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_2c0a6ec39f3546b2b2522fd9354cbf75~mv2.png
After the beat-up story of “Chromophobia”, “Sirene” seems to be a more poetic film, although here too links are made between the story and society and its flaws. We are in a harbor, a sad harbor where a sailboat is languishing. The only one present is a small fisherman, who only catches fish bones in his nets; the whole city, with its cranes and ship's rope, resembles a pile of nets and fish bones, carcasses of an industrial world in decline. At the bow of the ship is a whistling shipmate, one of those nice artists with whom Servais adorns his films. He tries to seduce a siren, or more accurately, its reflection. Her silhouette appears in strangely shiny waves, almost television waves – the skeleton of an image. In an almost Hitchcockian metaphor, the three-masted sails when the siren appears, but the sails disappear when the dinosaur cranes grab her and throw her onto the quay…
Servais says this film was a challenge for him and that it was the result of a desire to make something different from the other films. “Sirene” confused the critics and it also received fewer awards than “Chromophobia” – it was “only” seven…
Yet this film goes further than the previous one in many ways. By the way, “Sirene” opens many doors for Servais in Asia and in the United States, and especially in Iran, where he enjoyed a success that Servais himself calls “colossal”. He was received by Empress Farah Dibah, who even asked him to start an animation film school, an offer he politely declined. He did, however, bring Nouredin Zarrinkhelk from Iran to study at the KASK. More important than this anecdote, however, is that the enthusiasm from Iran shows that Servais' first films also appeal to non-European cultures: their visual language and the absence of idioms give them a universal power.
GOLDFRAME (1969)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_3edb43c46a1b4bd4adae40bbfc65bc16~mv2.png
For his next short film, Servais leaves the world of silence for the time being, and delivers a film in which dialogue plays a crucial role. It is also the first film that can be said to remove all ambiguity regarding its target audience: where the previous films could still be presented somewhat as children's films, "Goldframe" is resolutely a film for adults.
Everything starts with the ringing of a telephone. We overhear a conversation between Hollywood movie mogul Jason Goldframe, hidden behind his desk, and a man named Ted, whom we never get to see. Goldframe wants Ted to finish his film, the first shot on 270mm (!), “against the first…”, but that's all we hear. The tone is set: Mister Goldframe is a man who likes to give orders and who is not used to being contradicted. Goldframe wants to be first in everything – so he also wants to outrun his own shadow. A game he inevitably loses…
It is his shortest film, shot in black and white because, as he himself explains, he did not have enough money to pay for color – an explanation typical of the filmmaker's sincerity and modesty. At every stage of his career, Servais, like so many others, had to be guided in his choices by material circumstances. It usually ends well, because he knows how to make a virtue of necessity. This personal quality has undoubtedly largely determined his artistic success.
Although the film is received positively almost everywhere and although it wins a number of important prizes (it was selected for Cannes), it still provokes completely unexpected reactions here and there. “I had chosen the name 'Goldframe' by analogy with 'Goldfinger' and did not envision a caricature of a specific individual. Some, however, suspected me of anti-Semitism. In Los Angeles, I was told, the film was poorly received for that reason.” It is not the first time that Servais, the citizen of the world, has become the subject of erroneous and patriotic interpretations. At the time, some had seen in “Chromophobia” an indictment of the Stalinist dictatorship, while others had seen fascism denounced. They were both right, but each recovered Servais according to his own ideology.
TO SPEAK OR NOT TO SPEAK (1970)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_3bfd7c7afd03487485e7348cbaa2027f~mv2.png
Language takes center stage in another animated film, finished two years later, and eloquently titled “To Speak Or Not To Speak”. “I wanted to make something related to the manipulation of the individual, which exists in an aggressively capitalist world of money as well as in a fascist, militaristic world, where people are prepared for war. An individual who produces colored speech bubbles – it amazes you first and then you like it, you start using it and turning it into merchandise.” Yet – and it should be emphasized – this commitment does not prevent “To Speak Or Not To Speak” from being one of Servais' funniest films.
OPERATION X-70 (1971)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_83fb9d73170b4c73a9974f67af4313fd~mv2.png
In the early 1970s, the United States intensified its offensive against North Vietnam. Hanoi is experiencing the heaviest bombing in history. These 'air strikes' shock American and European public opinion, in which the memory of the Second World War is still very much alive. The war in Vietnam, the first mediatized war, is seen in shocking images during television news, but also in photos from the major news agencies. Needless to say, Servais is deeply shocked. The press also speaks of the massive defoliation and use by the US military of nerve agents. Servais needed to see nothing more to embark on a project whose title sounds like a military code name: “Operation X-70”. This time we get the story of an unexpected invasion of a country called 'Nebelux'. A mighty nation tests a new gas of war that doesn't kill, injure or suffocate, but rather stun and swoon its victims. Some of these X-70 gas bombs are accidentally dropped on Nebelux and cause a mutation in the population of this charming country. A special commando is sent to the scene to investigate the effect of this bombing raid on Western nationals.
Enchanted by the etchings of Marc Ampe, one of his former pupils, Servais proposes them to design the backgrounds and characters of the film. Ampe performs the main scenes without sketches, directly on the zinc plates. The sets are thus monochrome etchings, worked in aquatint, which gives them a grainy character, and they play with shades of gray as no cartoon had ever done before. The film, which is not very animated, does not leave much of the image that one can have of a conventional animation film. The theme is resolutely mature, the tone is 'chilly, documentary', the off-screen voice 'clinical' and all contribute to the impression that there is a world of difference between “Operation X-70” and that other anti-militarist film that was once the basis of Servais' oeuvre: “Chromophobia”.
“Operation X-70”, an atypical and uncartoon-like work, will become one of the highlights of his career for Servais: the film simultaneously wins the 'Prix Spécial du Jury' at the Cannes Film Festival in 1972 and the First Prize at the Zagreb International Animation Film Festival.
PEGASUS (1973)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_7536eade09d345499b2e889f78c32200~mv2.png
Servais discovered in the hinterland of Ostend, in the polders that are so typical of the Belgian coast, a dilapidated farm that he bought and converted into a country house. There he meets a neighbour, an impoverished farmer who seems to still be living in the old days. “While so many others had enriched themselves on the black market during the war, this man, who was also a patriot, had only one wealth: his horse. He walked it every night like one walks a dog. He had no tractor and lived in an archaic farm.” Servais also knew a farrier in his family who had to give up his trade. Servais himself is past forty when he makes this sad statement: “All these people had lost their raison d'être.” These people now would be the catalyst for “Pegasus”, the story of an old farrier who has been completely outpaced by technology. He revolts in his own absurd and unreal way by making metal horses with his own hands, large static idols in steel plate, which little by little take over the image.
For “Pegasus”, Servais takes up the thread of one of his old passions: expressionism. Servais makes the logical consideration that a visual form that is close to the aesthetics of Flemish expressionism would be the most suitable for this given.
“Pegasus” garnered less praise than its predecessors, but marks a turning point in Servais' career. It is his last 'cartoon'.
If we now look back at the films Servais has made up to that point, we realize how in just over 13 years he has made nine completely different films, each in a different style, with different techniques, sometimes diametrically opposed, sometimes in the line of other artists, mostly painter friends, which elicited the following comment from a critic at the time: “We could say that every film by Servais is not only an anti-Disney film, but also an anti-Servais film, in so far as he refuses to repeat itself.”
THE SONG OF HALEWYN (1976)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_09aa78941f9c45349ccfe3e1229395a6~mv2.png
On behalf of the Belgian Luna Films and the Italian Corona Cinematografica, Servais is making a 13-minute episode that should be part of a European series about stories and legends of the Old Continent. This commissioned film, which should not be treated in the same way as the other films, will soon consume its time and energy for two years. “The Song of Halewyn” offers him the opportunity to try a technique that is different from that of the cartoon: the technique of cut-outs on magnetic plate.
The story, a very slimmed-down version of what the oral tradition had made it, was supposed to be part of a prestigious television project. However, under pressure from the Italian producer, he was forced to replace the most 'bloody' shots with more 'acceptable' elements.
HARPYA (1979)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_e67f023233e7462c9884addafee46dcb~mv2.png
Six years will pass between the completion of “Pegasus” and that of “Harpya”. While the animation films by Servais have followed each other according to a steady rhythm, the preparation of this new work seems to take an exceptionally long time. There are several reasons for this. Servais, who had set up an animation department at the Ghent Academy, has to take on more and more responsibilities. In addition, he has accepted to teach at the Institut Supérieur de la Cambre in Brussels. The pedagogical work is burdened by administrative and legal obligations, of which it is a euphemism to say that Servais did not feel well. In addition, the success of his films has earned him the status of cultural ambassador for Flanders and Belgium. He is invited to juries, conferences and begins to become a public figure. Servais speaks three languages (Dutch, French and English) and that makes him a popular spokesperson, both in Flanders and in the surrounding countries. He rarely declines an invitation as he loves to support and defend the animated film he holds dear on all occasions, and he does so in the four corners of the world. This is the other side of Servais: the amiable and sensitive diplomat, who is always ready for contacts and encounters.
When “Harpya” is finally shown, he shocks everyone who knows Servais a little. It is a beneficial shock, because the film wins the Golden Palm at the 1979 Cannes Film Festival. Done with the beautiful, poetic stories, done with the transparent parables that drip with commitment. “Harpya” is a “slap in the face”. Two characters come face to face: a belle époque-style bourgeoisie with a mustache, flat straw hat and striped suit, and a mythological character, a harpy who takes the bread from his mouth and then partially eats it until only one hull remains. Where has the lovely siren gone…?
This mercilessly rhythmic thriller, permeated with wry humour, softened here and there by a few details such as the chip shop and other nods to typical Belgian phenomena, gives us the feeling that Servais is unconsciously settling some personal scores, especially with regard to the weak sex. “I like women very much, but not the dominant type, as I generally don't like dominant people.” In order to emphasize that this film heralds the end of any intention to provide social criticism, he broaches the theme of authority and dominance – a theme that can be found in all his films, but which takes its most extreme form in “Harpya”. .
TAXANDRIA (1994)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_a277bd256438406ea87e7e73c9b29b1e~mv2.png
After “Harpya”, another project caught Servais' imagination. We know of his experiences with Magritte and his admiration for Surrealism in general, but the painter who has fascinated him most for a long time is Paul Delvaux (1897-1994), who, moreover, lived, like himself, on the coast, in Saint Idesbald. Its dreamy ghost towns, populated by pale naked women, absent-minded scholars and neatly dressed orphaned men, its stations without travelers and trains without destinations — it seems they were made to attract Servais' attention. Servais devises a first draft of a screenplay, which is clearly intended for a full-length film, certainly not a short film. As early as 1983, a thick storyboard tells the story of a country called 'Taxandria' (the name actually exists: it was a province in Gallic Belgium). It is of course an imaginary country, such as the 'Nebelux' in "Operation X-70", one of those anti-Utopias that are of all times in literature.
A totalitarian regime has banned the notion of time. Watches have been confiscated and cameras are illegal, as they bear witness to a bygone moment. A theme that suits Servais very much: that of a force that is suppressed by a power that wants to rob the individual of his identity and that must be transformed by all means in function of a completely artificial world.
Since there were no producers of full-length animation films in Belgium at that time, Servais is looking for a feature film producer with a reputation for realizing unusual projects: Pierre Drouot and his Iblis Films. Drouot likes the idea that Servais wants to make a full-length film, but he is not very enthusiastic about Delvaux's 'participation'. “On the other hand, I must admit that I also felt that the use of his paintings could constitute a handicap,” Servais admits later. “After all, Delvaux's oeuvre functions at eye level. There is no upward or downward perspective. Everything is very 'horizontal' and Delvaux's global iconography turned out to be inadequate. We should have reinvented Delvaux.”
The production of “Taxandria” will therefore quickly move in a different direction. It will be the beginning of a long series of revisions to even turns of one hundred and eighty degrees. Dany Geys, one of Drouot's collaborators, launches the idea of associating Servais' world with that of a cartoonist who achieved a remarkable breakthrough: François Schuiten. At the suggestion of Benoît Peeters, his scriptwriter and loyal collaborator, Schuiten's work is seen as a whole of imagined, utopian cities, executed in architectural detail. “I immediately understood that he had the sensibility I was looking for for this film. He would become my closest collaborator and often my only ally in the battles to come.” Time passes by revisions and changes to the scenario and numerous interventions and interventions. At the same time, the project continues to grow. The technical setbacks pile up and finally, after 15 years of work and costs, the cash register is empty. The project is even about to be stopped.
An ultimate reworking of the scenario provides a large number of live action scenes, and a number of screenwriters including Servais himself are commissioned to work out additional passages in order to (try to) make the already finished parts fit together seamlessly.
The final film disappoints. There had been so much talk about the film that the expectations of Servais' admirers could not be fulfilled. “It's not an animated film,” Servais would say in a paraphrase of Magritte. A diplomatic way of making it clear that it is not a Servais film at all. The film does poorly at the box office, but is still shown to great acclaim at some festivals specializing in the fantastic film, such as Porto and Rome, where it takes the top prizes.
NIGHT BUTTERFLIES (1998)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_cd255173edf74fdd80086d8a49e65642~mv2.png
Traditional animation filmmaker Servais may have felt liberated after “Taxandria”. His new short film “Nachtvlinders” is being set up quickly and the preparation will take a year and a half.
Servais is not there to let the man fall for an idea if it is dear to him. He thus returns to the world of painter Paul Delvaux and very scrupulously transfers some canvases to the film image, but transforms them according to his own objectives. We are again close to “Harpya”: the same atmosphere of derailed mythology, a world in which the difficult relationships between the characters are labeled as incommunicable. A more subtle fear, however, seems to have replaced the feverish tension of “Harpya”: “Moths of the Night” starts from a strange sense of indefinable waiting and is in that respect a striking tribute to Delvaux's oeuvre.
Thus, filmmaker-painter Servais never seems to have come closer to his goal. To put it in his own words: “…one could have created more interesting passageways between the visual arts and the animation film, but they have never or almost never been used (…) I ventured into that precarious zone, this kind of no man's land between live cinema and painting, where there is so much to discover…”.
After “Nachtvlinders”, which received the “Grand Prix” and the “Prize of International Film Criticism” at the Annecy Festival 1998, a page seems to have turned. The old connection with Delvaux's work has finally taken shape and the usefulness of Servaisgraphy is now seen for what it is worth: a technique with a character all of its own.
ATRAKSION (2001)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_922acb025c4042dc861488f7d445a768~mv2.png
Under the spell of experiment, Raoul Servais succeeds in 'not repeating' in himself with “Atraksion”. The film will be realized in black and white, this time not because of a lack of money, but perhaps as an unconscious cover to the color exaltation of “Night butterflies”. The reason is the black-and-white striped tunics of the prisoners (captured of what? Of an inhuman society? Or of themselves?) who, chained by hands and feet, make their way through the empty and desolate sets to an indeterminate point of light in their to exist. The film is a parable in which Servais formulates his hope for a better future for humanity, but also indicates that humanity will then have to take care of that itself.
Servais also says about “Atraksion” that it is “not an animation film”, and rightly so because there is no animation process involved. The film is a very successful synthesis of live action and graphic decors, a process for which Servais now uses computer-controlled image processing. With this film, Servais not only accepts the inevitability of the technical aids of the digital age, but in his inimitable way he also immediately uses technology in a completely personal way.
The film is awarded the Special Prize of the Jury in Valladolid, and with a Special Mention in the UIP Competition European Film Academy in Ghent.
WINTER DAYS (2003)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_87186a6c13aa4a70966dfd753154c419~mv2.png
As part of the long compilation film “Winter Days” (Fuyo no hi), Raoul Servais creates an animation film of almost one minute, based on a verse of a poem by the 17th-century Japanese master Matsuo Basho. 35 renowned animators are involved in this project. The film, supervised by Kihachiro Kawamoto, was completed in 2003.
TANK (2015)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_b36c2cc50e3f4404b06ff3e4606d60c9~mv2.png
Despite his age, Raoul Servais has no intention of resting on his laurels. For several years, he has been developing three different projects related to the First World War, a historical fact that has been in the spotlight again from 2014 on the occasion of the centenary of the outbreak of the Great War.
Servais' most ambitious WWI project, "Pigeons" (subtitle: "myths and legends from the great war") is about paranormal events and unexplained sightings of frontline soldiers. The screenplay was originally intended for a full-length feature film, but that plan never got off the ground. Later on, a four-part TV film, to be realized in international co-production, is being considered. No animation, just ordinary film images, but with many digital edits to accurately depict the hallucinations of the front soldiers. At the end of 2014, under the impulse of producer Willem Thijssen (CinéTé) and in collaboration with Raoul Servais, an exhibition will be devoted to the stalled but not yet given project “Duiven” in Poperinge, West Flanders, with storyboards, drawings, watercolors and animatics.< /p>
The animation filmmaker can eventually realize another WWI project: “Tank”. The 6'20” short film will have its world premiere on October 13, 2015 on the opening night of the 42nd Film Fest Gent. Raoul Servais was inspired by the poignant poem “Le Tank” written by the French pacifist poet Pierre Jean Jouve about the new war machine that was deployed by the British against the Germans on 15 September 1916 during the Battle of the Somme in WWI. He calls his film "a free interpretation of that first tank attack, describing the traumatic experience for both the trench soldiers and the tank crew". The war heroes he presents are ordinary boys like Otto who writes letters to the beloved in the heimat and Johny who cherishes a photo of the girl waiting for him in England. The various facts from the 1914-18 war, told in black-and-white drawings, are colored blood red at the end...
DER LANGE KERL (2021)
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/988ce8_7d3f47a67a2c45f3a8340709fc93619a~mv2.png
Der Lange Kerl" is the 16th short film by Raoul Servais.
The story (like Raoul's previous work "Tank" from 2015) takes place on the battlefield during the First World War where a wounded Frenchman and a young German soldier of extraordinary size confront each other. The approximately 15-minute film uses both ordinary film recordings that are digitally edited afterwards, as well as animation film.
Raoul Servais conceived the story, wrote the screenplay and drew the storyboard. Due to his age, the 93-year-old animator worked with Rudy Pinceel, his co-director, to make the film. “I direct from a distance, Rudy is the director on site,” says Servais. Both know each other well because Rudy Pinceel followed Raoul with the camera for three years for his full-length documentary “SERVAIS” (2018).
The film is both a parody of Prussian militarism and a pacifist and humanist message.
The internationally renowned composer and conductor Dirk Brossé, not at his best when it comes to film music, wrote the music for this short film.
“This portrait of a young soldier condemned by his large stature to become a nightmare terror in the trenches of the First World War is a kind of inverted reflection of Raoul Servais, a 93-year-old young man who used his poetic art to expose oppression and violence.” (Alain Lorfèvre - La Libre Belgique 4/10/2021)